Skip to main content

sex like a puzzle

By August 12, 2009Blog

by Bryan Allain

My wife Erica and I are celebrating our 10-year wedding anniversary this month, and if I had to condense those 520 weeks of intimacy and experience into one piece of advice for you it would be this: When it comes to sex, remember that both of you are working on the same puzzle.

Confused? Let me explain.

Every couple goes through a puzzle phase at some point in their marriage. Completing a puzzle together is a great alternative to TV as it actually forces you to work together and communicate. It also provides a great opportunity to try out some new foreplay lines like, “I’d like to snap myself into you” or “you’re looking for a piece that fits here? Well, I’m looking for a piece that fits me.” (Use these at your own risk.)

Erica and I probably built 3 or 4 puzzles together before we got bored with it, but one thing we never tried to do was build two different puzzles at the same time. Imagine how difficult that would be? Each of us emptying our own 500 piece puzzles onto the same table, rifling through our pieces looking for flat edges while our piles begin to slowly mix into one? At every turn we’d be getting in each others way because our goals would be different. In trying to get my puzzle finished I’d be hampering Erica from completing hers.

Not only is this a terrible way to work on a puzzle, it’s also a terrible way to treat marital intimacy. Yet oftentimes, this is exactly how sex is handled in a marriage. Instead of working towards a common goal, each person brings in their own puzzle and only cares about what’s in it for them. She only likes to be on top. He wishes they could have more morning sex. She would like more cuddling before and after. He wants to try out that new position, “The Inverted Lawnmower”. When sex is only about completing your individual puzzle, it doesn’t take long for things to fall apart. Instead of creating one beautiful picture, you end up with two frustrated people confused as to why their sex life isn’t what it should be.

Bringing a selfish attitude into the bedroom completely undermines what the whole point of sex is in the first place. As a couple, you should decide on the “picture” you want to create and talk about how you’re going to get there. Yes, that means talking openly about sex with your spouse. You should talk about everything from favorite (and least favorite) positions, to how dirty the talk can get, to what (if anything) is off limits. Nothing should be too taboo to talk about because in communicating with each other, you’re creating the puzzle picture the two of you are going to spend a whole lot of steamy nights (and afternoon delights) putting together.

If an honest examination of your intimacy reveals that more often than not each of you are working toward your own goals, I encourage you to take a step back and reinvent your sex life with your husband or wife. Throw out the separate puzzles you’ve been working on and decide to work on one together. Forget about the expectations you’ve picked up from movies, past relationships, porn, or other people’s sex habits and have open discussions with each other about what you want YOUR unique picture to look like as a couple. Then, as you put the puzzle together piece by piece, keep the dialogue open. With each piece of honesty and experience you connect together, your picture will become clearer and clearer.

A healthy sex life in a marriage is always a work in progress, but the key is to make sure you’re both working together toward the same goal. Chances are you’ll never complete the picture, but if you do, be sure to glaze it with that puzzle glue, frame it, and mount it on your wall for everyone to see.

(Okay, I think I just took the analogy a bit too far. But hopefully you get the idea.)

Bryan Allain is a writer, engineer, father of two, and husband of one.
He writes, he speaks, and he loves getting people in trouble for laughing.

QUESTION: What do you believe is an important piece of the sexual puzzle for husbands and wives?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Viagra is for the treatment of inability to get or keep an hard-on and similar states when erection is of low quality. When you buy remedies like cialis from canada you should know about cialis online canada. It may have a lot of brands, but only one ATC Code. Erectile disfunction, defined as the persistent impossibility to maintain a satisfactory hard-on, affects an estimated 15 to 30 millions men in the America alone. Sexual soundness is an substantial part of a man’s life, no matter his age etc.

Matthew Paul Turner

Author Matthew Paul Turner

More posts by Matthew Paul Turner

Join the discussion 18 Comments

  • Ah, yes, the legendary “inverted lawnmower.” When we tried it, I lost a few fingers. But it was worth it…

    Anyway, great post.

  • Great post. And puzzles are a really great analogy and pretty much everything you say to your spouse while completing one can be followed up with, ‘that’s what she said.’

  • thanks for the honest talk about sex. great main point, and super analogy. i just texted my wife and said, “i want to build a puzzle with your private parts.” do you think that was a good move?

  • Elizabeth says:

    While I can appreciate the general idea behind this post; I think it misses the point.

    Yes, sex should not be selfish. But WHY?

    Because the primary purpose of sex is not pleasure. It’s procreation. Sex is a deeply powerful gift from God because it involves the CREATION of a living soul.

    Through the act of sex, we co-create with God a new human being.

    That is a sacred responsibility!

    To say that selfless sex means learning to “piece together your spouse’s puzzle” cheapens the act itself and denies our sacred responsibility.

    Frankly, I’m dismayed by all the off-color jokes about positions, etc.

    The world treats sex so casually. I guess I expected more of my fellow brothers and sisters and in Christ.

    Mother of Five,
    Elizabeth

  • bill smith says:

    we should not be selfish with sex, because we should not be selfish with each other. we should lay down our lives for each other in everything that we do…not sure in the Bible where it says that God created sex primarily to procreate. when he talks about two becoming one, there’s no caveat that they then have to become “three”. I think that God thrives in intimate relationships, because that’s where we can catch a glimpse of His depth of love for us.
    and hey, if that’s still your stance, you can still have sex, just don’t enjoy it.

  • Susan Isaacs says:

    Elizabeth makes a good point: sex is sacred. Maybe the off-color jokes aren’t appropriate, or maybe she’s reacting to our entire culture in which sex is devalued and joked about. I appreciate her comment.

    I don’t agree with her assessment that the chief purpose of sex is procreation. If that were so, the Song of Songs would not be in the canon of scripture.

    “The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever.”

    God enjoys enjoyment. Now it’s quite true that our culture has overlooked procreation and focused just on pleasure. But to say that procreation is the only or chief end of sex would deny part of our beliefs.

    My husband and I can’t have children, so if sex is just for procreation, where does that leave us?

  • Jody Webster says:

    “Because the primary purpose of sex is not pleasure. It’s procreation. Sex is a deeply powerful gift from God because it involves the CREATION of a living soul.”

    As a dad of three myself, I’m very glad that of the many times I have had sex with my wife, only three have involved the creation of a living soul. We wouldn’t have room to house all the babies!

    If the primary purpose of sex is baby-making, it would seem that married couple should refrain from having except during those fertile occasions (and when you add in 9 months of pregnancy that would only leave about twice a year). Making babies is definitely one awesome purpose of sex, but to claim that it is the purpose of sex ignores a lot of the power of sex in marriage.

    That said, this was a great article!

  • ttm says:

    Important pieces of the puzzle:

    honest communication, loving kindness, sincere forgiveness, developing trust, the freedom to laugh, the freedom to fail, unashamed curiousity, and desire

    Thanks for another great article!

  • jasonS says:

    Great post, Bryan. The humor added to your point (which is a great one). Thanks…

  • Blake Zook says:

    Not gonna lie Bryan… It was kinda awkward reading this. Good, but awkward. Thanks.

  • Elizabeth,
    While I can appreciate the general idea behind your comment; I think it misses the point.

    Have you ever read Song of Solomon? It says nothing about procreation. For example;
    “Your two breasts are like two fawns,like twin fawns of a gazelle
    that browse among the lilies.”

    It says nothing about those twin fawns browsing among the lilies for the sole purpose of feeding her offspring.

    Sex only for procreation is a myth.

    Of course there’s a purpose to sex; intimacy with each other, and with God. A possible side effect is babies. (Which is also a side-effect of dancing, so watch out for that.)

    Just kidding about the babies being a side-effect thing, although clinically, I suppose it is true.

    Children are a true blessing from God, and being a part of that miracle is an amazing opportunity. But that miracle is one small part of the astounding life God created for us. As with every other part of our faith, it should be taken as a whole, and used to see the Father in all his glory, and then worship him accordingly.

    As far as the off-color jokes; the world may take sex casually, but I’m pretty sure Bryan and the other commentors do not. We should be able to speak frankly, and openly about sex. We should be able to make jokes too because sometimes sex can be funny!

    Ultimately, we shouldn’t be ashamed to openly discuss something that God gave us as a gift.

  • I missed SusanIsaacs comment the first time around. She said it much better than I did.

    I appreciate your comment too Elizabeth, and I agree with Susan that the way the world treats sex is honestly disgusting. I just don’t think that includes this blog, or the comments following.

  • Cindy Beall says:

    *Still blushing*

    However, I will say that it took us a good 10-12 years of being married to get good at sex.

    Ahem. Did I just write that?

    Nice piece, Bryan 🙂

  • Elizabeth says:

    MPT thinks I’m being unfair in my judgment of Bryan’s article.

    That’s interesting. Is disagreement unfair?

    To be clear, I’m *super* glad God made baby-making pleasurable. We’ve made 5 babies ourselves! 🙂

    That’s my point: pleasure + procreation go together. Historically speaking, Christians did not compartmentalize the pleasure of sex from its natural byproduct: babies.

    I never said (read my comment) that the ONLY purpose of sex was procreation. But several people have repeated that–including the author who tweeted “Just got a comment on my sex post saying sex is for procreation, not pleasure. Anyone want to go rebut?”

    Bryan, that’s not what I wrote. But I guess it proves the point.

    If Christians believe that the PRIMARY purpose of sex is pleasure, then babies are unintended consequences, or as Jerrod wrote (half-jokingly), that babies are “side-effects” of sex.

    Why not just say that the creation of a living soul is a series of highly evolved chemical reactions? Happy accidents?

    Yes, I have read SOS. I’ve also read God’s first command: “Be fruitful and multiply”

    🙂
    Mother of 5,
    Elizabeth

  • Bryan Allain says:

    Elizabeth,

    I don’t think you were being unfair. I have no problem with your disagreements, though i think you’re off base on a few of them.

    First off, in response to my tweet…i’ve been in the car for 7 hours and had no way to type out a response. so i had an iphone and 140 characters to try and drive people to the thread. if i misquoted you, i’m sorry. did not mean to.

    As for the off-color jokes, that’s just my style of writing. I understand if you’re not okay with that…not everyone is. But I joke about a lot of stuff I take seriously. the two do not preclude each other. i know talking about positions (albeit fake ones) will ruffle some people and I’m okay with that.

    I believe that sex is an extremely sacred act. I am the oldest of 5 children. I have 2 of my own. I believe creating life is sacred.

    I also believe that sexual intimacy is sacred when it doesn’t produce life. I believe that heavy petting, oral sex, and making out is sacred as it is two people giving their bodies to each other. These are acts that do not produce life, so does that mean you don’t see them as sacred?

    you said “Historically speaking, Christians did not compartmentalize the pleasure of sex from its natural byproduct: babies.” Historical christianity has a lot of bad that goes along with bad. Personally, I’m hesitant to build an argument around it.

    Why does sex have to have a PRIMARY purpose? Just so we can argue about it. It is a mysterious gift given us by God. It brings couples together in a way that nothing else can. It is the means by which we create new life. Why must we tray and rank the purposes?

    I can assure you I do not treat sex casually. I joke about it. I enjoy it. It brought me 2 kids.

    thanks for being honest and discussing Elizabeth (And everyone else). Hope that clears up my position, err, stance.

    bryan

  • (whole-jokingly)…just sayin’.

    And, “Be fruitful and multiply” seems like a logical thing to say before there were 6.7 billion people inhabiting the earth. I think we’re a lot closer to the need for good stewardship at this point.

  • Bryan Allain says:

    after re-reading my comment, 2 things:

    1 – I meant to say “Historical christianity has a lot of bad that goes along with good.”

    2 – that was way too inflammatory and reactionary. apologize for that elizabeth, as i dont like to talk like that.

    as you were…

  • Elizabeth says:

    Bryan: Thanks for the clarification and the follow-up clarification! I appreciate that. 🙂 Sometimes nuance gets lost on Twitter and I totally don’t hold that against you. No hard feelings, bro. Really. It’s cool.

    I appreciated your perspective. Also, I should have said this earlier–I completely agree with your original point about having a loving, selfless sex life with one’s spouse.

    Perhaps we just go about it differently! 🙂

    I might be able to discuss more later, but right now two of my “side-effects” need my attention.
    😉

    Elizabeth